Re: [Q] Re: [xemacs-base] Add byte-compiler warning control library
* Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Steve Youngs writes:
> Having `package-suppress' do _anything_ is the first step, though.
The more I think about it, the more I think `package-suppress'
itself is a step backward.
Quite possibly, yes.
Is there really any excuse for either regexp-opt or easy-mmode to
be in core?
Considering that you'd only be using the core versions of those if you
_didn't_ have the xemacs-base package installed, I'd have to say
"nope".
Do you have other use-cases for package-suppress?
There's no others in packages, and the only other I've heard of is
your suggestion originating from this thread. But as my initial query
showed, it can be handled in the lib itself easy enough.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| SXEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------------<steve(a)sxemacs.org>---|
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Attachments:
- attachment.sig (application/pgp-signature — 312 bytes)