Re: Why no __attribute__ ((unused)) for g++?

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; wrote: Because once upon a time I had a version of g++ that complained that I couldn't use that attribute due to the optional argument feature of C++. I can't seem to locate a g++ that does that now, and I don't remember how long ago it was (and hence, which version of g++ did that). We could try removing the "&& !defined(__cplusplus)" part and see if anybody complains. For that matter, the __INTEL_COMPILER part was based on 2 major versions ago of the Intel compiler. The version I currently have installed, 9.1.047, also takes __attribute__ ((unused)) without complaint. I never checked version 8. If __INTEL_COMPILER is defined, then the check should be __INTEL_COMPILER >= 800 or >= 900, depending. Does anybody have a version 8 installed? -- Jerry James, Assistant Professor james(a)xemacs.org Computer Science Department http://www.cs.usu.edu/~jerry/ Utah State University _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta