kai uwe tempel writes:
 Robert Pluim writes:
  > temu(a)medizin.uni-leipzig.de writes:
  >  > XEmacs 21.4.5 "Civil Service" configured for
`i386-debian-linux'.
  > 
  > This is debian unstable, I imagine? 
 
 that's right. (but it isn't really unstable :)
 
  > XEmacs 21.5  (beta3) works fine on the same machine).
 
 i tried to avoid to install non-.deb packed programs. even i know (and
 tested) it works well (having 2 xemacs'es).
 
Ah, so this is the .deb you've installed?  For some reason I thought
you were compiling it yourself (especially as I can't find it in the
standard unstable package list).
 
 Andy Piper writes:
  > Please check that you are not suffering from Xaw3d installed as
  > Xaw. I think debian is particularly susceptible to this.
 
 installed "as" xaw? i don't know.
 8<--
 ../b # dpkg -l xaw* 
<snip>
I don't think this is the problem in this case.
  > <sigh> This turns out to be the -z combreloc crash, which
I'd
                                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 can i check this? where can i read about this? 
If you look in the xemacs-beta archives it's described there.  Don't
worry about it,  your XEmacs is not suffering from that problem, mine
was.
 sorry, by xemacs has no symbol table compiled in. i have to rebuild
 it: the only one i'd done was "cvs-status" and input the repository
 8<--
 ../b # gdb /usr/bin/xemacs-21.4.5-nomule
 GNU gdb 5.0.90-cvs (MI_OUT)
 [... ] (gdb) run
 Starting program: /usr/bin/xemacs-21.4.5-nomule 
 (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols
found)...
 [...]
 (no debugging symbols found)...
 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
 0x40197de0 in XDrawLine () from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
 (gdb) quit 
Whee! I can reproduce this, and it's the progress gauge falling
over. Andy, is there any useful info I can give you here?
There are two workarounds:
1. put (setq progress-feedback-use-echo-area t) in your .emacs file.
2. Install lesstif and lesstif-dev and recompile XEmacs
 
 ps: lots of thanks for your fast response. 
That's what we're paid for ;-)
Robert
--