On Mar 17, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas A Schmitz
<thomas.schmitz(a)uni-bonn.de> writes:
Thomas> Using Carbon XEmacs
Unfortunately, the author has requested conditions of distribution
that I believe we cannot comply with, as they would violate the GPL.
So we know nothing about Carbon-specific problems.
Inasmuch as the carbon device type is featured several times in the
backtrace, I'm afraid it is a Carbon problem, not more general.
I suggest you seek support from the author.
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://
turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba
305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
Too bad---I had seen that there were some serious disagreements
between Andrew Choi and the xemacs devs. But it's a bit hopeless
since I'm stuck in a triangle between xemacs, auctex, and Andrew
Choi. Sad, because I had really begun to like xemacs over gnu emacs,
but it looks like the minority using carbon xemacs with auctex is so
tiny as to be invisible. Anyway, thanks for the courteous reply.
Thomas