Re: Martin, Ben, please look [was: CORE in gnus during reply]

Hrvoje> The "obvious" way should work. The original is: OK. I get lost in the labyrinth of lisp-union.h, and don't trust anything to be obvious. Hrvoje> This has the added bonus of evaluating both var and value Hrvoje> only once, and in proper order. But I thought in general C doesn't guarantee order of evaluation for operands, with a few exceptions like && (and in particular not for = or function arguments)? So that seems unnecessary, as long as you don't put side effects into the arguments, which is bad practice anyway. (The current macros only evaluate each argument once.) -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."