comment line-or-region

Andreas Roehler writes: I'm sorry, I don't have time to try this out at the moment (I don't use comment functions much anyway), but I have a couple of remarks. First, the idea is a good one IMO; most of the comment functions have a fair amount of DWIM-ishness to them anyway. However, it's possible that some people won't like it. Maybe there should be a mode to control how much DWIM there is? In the keywords, I don't think "wp" is appropriate. Word processors don't use comments. Should be "languages" (unless GNU have edited their finder keywords list, in which case we should update). The use of the suffix "-lor" reads well on a symbol-for-symbol basis, but "lor-comment-" reads almost as well and is compatible with the traditional use of prefixes to create pseudo-namespaces. It's also less confusing when used with functions that don't DWIM line-or-region. I'm not sure what you want to do with this. Replace newcomment entirely? Merge it into newcomment? _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta