Re: binary kits for 21.0?
>>>> "dv" == Didier Verna
<verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes:
dv> sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) writes:
Hrvoje> (literally). I don't know why it's still labeled beta. Steve, bug or
Hrvoje> feature?
>
> Bug, I'd say.
>
> >> - AFAIK, there has been no official 21.0 announcement
>
Hrvoje> It was on xemacs-announce.
>
> There has been no announcement on comp.emacs.xemacs, and the web page
> still says 20.4.
>
> All the discussion about binary kits and the 21.0 release has raised
> far more questions than provided answers. What *is* the release
> strategy for the future? What status will 21.0 have? How will we
> deal with binary kits. I'm sure you guys thought up something in
> Japan, but it sure hasn't hit xemacs-beta yet.
dv> The japan release was supposed to be 21.0.
More questions. What's a "japan release"? What does this whole
sentence mean? It would be great if someone who was there could type
up some rough minutes of what happened there.
dv> For some reason, it was still labeled "beta". So I suggested to
dv> Steve that we should wait for the first patchlevel[1] release
What's a "patchlevel release"? Are we talking about 21.1.x? Is this
related to the 19.15 patchlevels in process?
--
Cheers =8-} Chipsy
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla