Re: Various problems

|--==> "JJ" == Jerry James <james(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: JJ> Using any optimization setting at all causes it to link correctly. So JJ> now the question becomes whether we should try to work around this bug JJ> or not, and if so, how. Is the optimisation only needed with '--error-checking=all' (on gcc)? What consequences will arise from unconditionally turning on say '-O1' if '--error-checking=all'? Would backtraces be affected detrimentally? If nothing's likely to blow up in our face I'd suggest if anyone uses '--error-checking=all' then add '-O1' to the new cflags_warnings. That way it won't be overridden by someone's $CFLAGS if they have it set. What do you think? In any event, it would probably be a good idea to add an entry to PROBLEMS. -- |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---| | XEmacs - It's not just an editor. | | It's a way of life. | |------------------------------------&lt;youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt;---|