Mats Lidell writes:
If I'm not mistaken it is just one elisp file so what do you say
about
adding it to xemacs-base?
Just from the name, I think xemacs-devel is probably more
appropriate. The question would be how many developers building these
packages don't have xemacs-devel installed. I would think that would
be few, but if there are more than a small number, we could put in in
xemacs-base.
Steve
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta