Re: Where do you want to go tomorrow?

Holger> Okay, I buy that (essentially that's why I'm watching Erik's Holger> CL-Emacs). But I don't think it's a reason to start a Scheme-CL Holger> language discussion. Why not have an engine that supports both Holger> (besides Elisp), which abstracts away from specific language Holger> details ? Most Scheme engines would support this easily; it would probably take a few more instructions to tune them to the #f/NIL issue as well as separated function/value slots, but none of these is a big deal. The real issue is, of course, the compiler, which someone would have to write. However, since CLISP, GCL etc. come with CLISP parsers and elaborators, this is probably doable. (Certainly not PhD-level work. But still work. Still a lot of it.) -- Cheers =8-} Chipsy Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla