On 16 Oct 2003, stephen(a)xemacs.org wrote:
Uwe> Very strange some years ago, he answered almost before I sent
Uwe> the mail
My first guess would be that we don't have his current mail address
in the file and so on. While most folks capable of developing
packages useful for a long time keep their address the same, a few
submit to the temptation to run from spam.
The second possibility would be a really fascist spam filter, but
that doesn't sound like Jari, either.
That is a point. I admit I use such a
filter recently, since I am
faced with a spam 'attack' (around 1000 mails a day), but for sure
Jari has some more intelligent solution.
It is however frustrating to have a package (which I rely on very
much), which gets updated, but no bug report gets answered.
(Best would be if the Xemacs package maintainers would have the
authors 'real' address, carefully protected from spammers of course;
just kidding)