|--==> "CW" == Christoph Wedler <Wedler> writes:
>Oh, I didn't realize that you were referring specifically to
the
>info-look library.  D'oh.  Yes, if the existing library already uses
>overlay.el, we should require it. 
  CW> Fine.  I hope that this means that my patch is approved.
How's this for a compromise?
I'll withdraw my veto and apply your patch.  But I'd like it if you
could at least consider converting info-look to using extents instead
of overlays.  If you don't want to, that's cool, I'll still apply your
patch.
I just think that we should be using our extents api whenever possible
instead of overlays.  Now there's a nice little job for some
conscientious hacker, getting rid of overlays from all the XEmacs
packages.:-)
Anyway, thanks for your contributions, Christoph, I really do
appreciate them.
-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
|            XEmacs - It's not just an editor.             |
|                    It's a way of life.                   |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|