Re: Dynamically deriving major mode from prog-mode or fundamental-mode
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Dominik Honnef <dominikh(a)fork-bomb.org>wrote:
Brian Palmer <bpalmer(a)gmail.com> writes:
> This is perhaps suboptimal, but perhaps
> (if (not (fboundp 'prog-mode))
> (define-derived-mode prog-mode fundamental-mode ...))
>
> and then always derive go-mode from prog-mode ?
Would the body of that mode be empty or would I have to set some
variables?
Yes, the body would remain empty. It'd only be a placeholder mode.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta