Re: rx
Mats Lidell writes:
>>>>> Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
Stephen> In principle, if GNU Emacs has it and we don't, that's a bug.
OK. So then rx is on that "bug" list of packages or interfaces we
should support. Where should we add it? xemacs-base!?
re-builder, no? It's unfortunate that the package is named for a
relatively small specific library, but probably we shouldn't change
that at this point.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta