Re: New sumo oddities
>>>> On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:47:57 +0200, Norbert Koch
<viteno(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
* "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org>:
Hi!
> > oops it is still in the branch? Didn't we discuss
this?
>
> Not that I can recall, but I'm not sure that means it didn't
> happen.:-)
Seems like I've been mistaken. Could be that we are on
trunk in alioth, but we may not have been on
sunsite.dk.
So, the question is, where are all the changes Jerry is
missing? Uwe, could you try to sync the package with
upstream IFF this is allowed due to license issues?
Aeh, now I don't understand exactly want you want. As far as
I can see the official Xemacs auctex pkg is in sync with auctex
11.84. (I don't understand why it is not reflected in SUMO).
Or do you mean to synchronise Xemacs auctex pkg with a more
recent version of auctex?
Well if this is the question then (sic) the answer is no,
auctex 11.85 is under GPL 3 (or 3+ I am not sure). (So is
the most recent version of reftex for that matter, the
official Xemcas reftex pkg is hopelessly outdated).
As far I can remember months (if not a year) ago I asked
innocently about upgrading reftex and then this hm messy
discussion about the different GPL versions started.
Uwe
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta