Re: auto-autoloads errors

Michael Sperber writes: Yeah, but I don't understand why we try to load the same package autoloads twice. People do this all the time (in particular, people who have a distro-based SUMO installation and want to have an up-to-date version of a particular package), and we really should support that and not whine about it. (Of course an explicit request for shadows such as report-xemacs-bug should list them.) I guess xemacs-packages hierarchies shadow each other, but site-packages doesn't shadow xemacs-packages? A different question: I wonder if it would be possible (ie, with a reasonable amount of coding effort) and worthwhile to report whole-package shadows instead of zillions of library shadows for each shadowed package? Steve _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta