Steve Youngs wrote:
* Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> Ville Skyttä <scop(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>> Yes, sure, that's why I threw in the idea of moving these lists
>> to xemacs-base... AFAICS, no new problems would be introduced by
>> doing that compared to the current situation.
> I agree and wouldn't object to this.
> Let's see what others have to say about this.
I object. These lists don't change anywhere near often enough to
warrant them not being in core. Moving them out of core and into
packages is a step away from the goal of a working PUI in a
"packageless" XEmacs.
IMO, PUI should work from `xemacs -no-autoloads'.
i agree.