Re: split apart ChangeLog for etc/
do we really have to?
seems to make more sense just to put in one entry for etc/*. it should
be pretty obvious, if there are no etc/ entries in the top-level
ChangeLog, where to look.
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>>>>>"Jan" == Jan Vroonhof
<jan.vroonhof(a)ntlworld.com> writes:
>>>>>
Jan> Ben Wing <ben(a)666.com> writes:
>> What do you think? Some may argue that I'm "rewriting"
>> history, but I'm clearly not -- just rearranging. All the
>> history is still there.
Jan> If somebody does object you can always move the current
Jan> changelog to ChaneLog.x and start two new fresh ones.
This undercuts the purpose, though.
Put in a log like
2002-04-01 ChangeLog Police <finicky(a)xemacs.org>
* etc/ChangeLog: new file.
etc/sample.xemacs: ChangeLog entries moved to etc/ChangeLog.
.
.
.
It would be only 100 lines if just entries in etc/ were listed. There
are some subdirectories (about 600 total directory entries), but many
are 21.5-specific (unicode stuff) or CVS. Others (photos, pixmaps)
could presumably be abbreviated to just mentioning the directory, too.
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.0 KB)