Re: GTK: In or out? I need more non-Linux build reports!!

I'll present results to date in a separate mail. sjt> Please do builds of the gtk-xemacs sources --with-gtk=no. Oh, yeah. Do them on machines where GTK+ and GNOME are _not_ installed, too. That absolutely must work. Sandra> When do you need them by? Three weeks before the release date ;-) I apologize for another management inefficiency, but let's put it this way: do them as soon as you can, and watch xemacs-beta because I or Bill will announce when the urgency passes (basically, when Bill starts merging back to the release branch). It will still be useful even if later than that, but it probably can't affect the go/no-go decision. Sandra> what machines are most important to you? For Linux, anything non-Intel. Alpha and Sparc Linux, I guess are about the same priority as say Solaris (Solaris would be rather important, except that I know Bill will provide a lot of data there), but it's hard to judge. Any other Linuces would be lower priority. For non-Linux, whatever the most common platform for the OS is. Except that I'm getting a fair number of Sparc/Solaris builds recently, so Sparc/Solaris, like Intel/Linux is near zero priority--- if that's your main platform, by all means, submit build reports, it helps, but I would prefer any extra effort to go in other directions. Sandra> I can probably do a couple of builds on Monday at Red Hat, Sandra> but I need to know what the priority OSes are, because I Sandra> have too many available to me. NT native (I doubt you're set up for that, but others may be, and I should have been more specific about priorities). Cygwin. Irix. HPUX. NetBSD, OpenBSD. Then Solaris and FreeBSD, but Bill has done those and probably will report them very shortly. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."