Holger Schauer <schauer(a)coling.uni-freiburg.de> writes:
>>>>"AP" == Andy Piper schrieb am Thu, 02 Jul
1998 12:19:29 +0100:
AP> At 12:53 PM 7/2/98 +0200, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
>> When using a subset of a standardized language, you can still
>> write conformant programs. The reason to use the subset instead
>> of the unabridged experience is, of course, efficiency.
AP> I am dead against this. A subset loses us much of what we would
AP> gain through swapping to a standard language engine. We would
AP> just have eclisp instead of elisp which is just as bad IMHO.
Thanks. I could not have said it better.
Only both of you got it wrong.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
HOW YOU CAN TELL THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A ROTTEN DAY:
#15 Your pet rock snaps at you.