Re: Unicodification of sources, part 1

Removing XEmacs Review from addressees; please keep discussion on the open lists. sjt> I propose the following process for 21.5 and the packages: Mike> I'm not sure I understand the impact on 21.4. I don't fully understand what would need to be done to allow 21.4 to handle Unicode robustly, so any impact on 21.4 would put the proposal on hold until we make a decision about how to handle it. Destabilizing 21.4 is not acceptable to me. Mike> Stages 1-3b just refers to the 21.5 source tree, and not packages? Yes. Mike> Does 21.5 have to be promoted to stable prior to Stage 4? Probably. If we can find a way to work with unicodified packages in 21.4, OK, we can move faster, but that's Vin's call as far as I am concerned. -- School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.