jari.aalto(a)poboxes.com (Jari Aalto+mail.emacs) writes:
The Lisp is unfortunately not the future and has never been in
large scale business programming.
Oh, Lisp has been the future for over 40 years now ;-)
But could we please avoid turning this into a Perl vs. Lisp flamewar?
There are going to be people who want to embed all kinds of languages
into emacs, the relevant questions should be what framework that best
allows that, while remaining maintainable. Subprocesses, loadable
modules, "one big executable", and corba have been mentioned. I good
start would be to mention pros and contras for these, or comming up
with alternatives.