Re: [Bug: 21.4.16] make-glyph doc-string missing essential information

David> If you bothered reading my reports instead of just crying David> "it is David again, let us all bash him", then that would David> be great, thank you. I did read your report, and I considered your request unreasonably demanding (see below). It is true I single you out, but I am not bashing; I'm suggesting that to meet your needs we need a more radical approach. Ben won't do it, I still might. Do you have a problem with that? David> What is so fscking hard about "can return a specifier or David> nil" or "will either return a valid specifier or throw an David> error"? Nothing's hard about that, but that's not what you asked for; you asked for what errors would it throw. Emacs Lisp does not have a "throws" keyword; to the best of my knowledge very few functions are documented as throwing errors at all, let alone what errors they might throw even though almost all can (except those delibertately designed to suppress errors). David> What is eating you people? Nothing. Both Ben and I in rather different ways treated your report with complete respect. I'm sorry you don't see it that way. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.