Ville Skyttä <scop(a)xemacs.org> writes:
On Monday 05 February 2007 17:19, Michael Sperber wrote:
> Nobody commented on this a while back; I'm committing to flush my
> workspace, and to maybe generate some feedback :-) (I do believe it's
> the right thing.)
Sorry, didn't get around to testing it. What's the relation of this patch to
the Canna one I sent - should this one render it unnecessary?
I believe your Canna patch deleted a directory prefix from some module
name, right? If so, your patch should go in. (... and mine should
render Stephen's objection unnecessary) If not, it shouldn't.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta