Re: [Q Re: [V PACKAGES (latin-unity)] Fix build. (generate latin-unity-tables.el)

|--==> "SJT" == Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: SJT> QUERY SJT> Sorry to bug you again, but as long as you're interested enough to try SJT> to get it right, I'm gonna ask: That's cool. SY> [...] SJT> # Experimental rule to build latin-unity-tables.el. SJT> -latin-unity-tables.el: latin-unity-vars.elc latin-unity-utils.elc SJT> - $(BOOT_XEMACS) -l latin-unity-utils -f latin-unity-dump-tables SJT> - ＠echo "*** You may see a few warnings about ISO 8859/3. ***" SJT> - ＠echo "*** This is OK; it doesn't use all code points. ***" SJT> +#latin-unity-tables.el: latin-unity-vars.elc latin-unity-utils.elc SJT> +# $(BOOT_XEMACS) -l latin-unity-utils -f latin-unity-dump-tables SJT> +# ＠echo "*** You may see a few warnings about ISO 8859/3. ***" SJT> +# ＠echo "*** This is OK; it doesn't use all code points. ***" SJT> Is this deletion necessary? No, I just commented it out for cleanliness because it wasn't going to be used by the XPRM. But having it in there won't hurt anything. It's going to be needed if/when building the tables becomes a safe thing to do for everyone, so feel free to uncomment it again. Anyone who wanted to build their own tables could simply 'make latin-unity-tables.el' from latin-unity's source directory. SJT> If it's necessary, how about a rule SJT> .PHONY: build-table SJT> build-table: latin-unity-vars.elc latin-unity-utils.elc [...] This would work too, but I wouldn't do it because if/when the tables are _always_ built this would need to be renamed to "latin-unity-tables.el". It might get forgotten. -- |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---| | XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. | | Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! | |------------------------------&lt;sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au&gt;---|