Re: Moving the packages repo and converting to Mercurial
Marcus Harnisch writes:
Michael Sperber <sperber(a)deinprogramm.de> writes:
> #2 is more attractive from a design perspective, and it's what I'd like
> to do.
Agreed. But is there a good way to express package dependencies?
Not that I know of. But this is no worse than CVS.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta