|--==> "VS" == Ville Skytt <Ville> writes:
VS> With these changes, I can now build my unsupported packages
VS> using practically the same Makefiles as in official packages.
Cool.
VS> Steve, yell if this doesn't look good to you (or if I shouldn't
VS> have [AC]'d this).
Looks good to me.
And, just for the record, you guys have free reign on anything in
'unsupported'. Consider all patches to the unsupported tree as
pre-approved[1]. If you want to submit patches to xemacs-patches
for unsupported, that's cool; if you don't want to, that's cool
too[2].
VS> Is there a cleaner way to do the package-compile.el
VS> thing below?
I don't know, but if you come up with a better way feel free to
implement it.
Footnotes:
[1] Providing of course they don't affect normal packages or core.
[2] Unless any reviewer objects to this.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---|
| XEmacs - It's not just an editor. |
| It's a way of life. |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|