Norbert Eisinger writes:
xemacs-21.5.21 has a menu "open with specified encoding"
that offers, in one of its submenus, ISO-8859-1 (Latin 1).
xemacs-21.5.27 has the same menu that offers many options
nubered 1...9,0,a...i but ISO-8859-1 (Latin 1) does not
seem to be among them. Is this as it's supposed to be
or does it indicate some installation problem?
I'm don't know why there would be a difference between the two
versions, unless your OS vendor (SuSE, wasn't it?) made changes.
You'd have to ask them about that. I have not done any work on the
encoding stuff personally in the last year; you should send your query
to <xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org> where the people who have made changes
recently will see it.
I can tell you that ASCII doesn't exist as a separate encoding; it's
simply a subset of ISO-8859, and will be detected as the ISO-8859
variant which is appropriate for your locale. ISO-8859-1 is treated
somewhat differently from the rest of the ISO-8859 family; it is
simply an alternative name for "binary".
xemacs-21.5.21 data-html.txt status line: "MIME/LTN-9"
content looks fine
xemacs-21.5.27 data-html.txt status line: "Binary" content looks fine
Is "Binary" what it should say for ASCII content?
This probably means that your configuration is slightly different for
the two versions. That could easily be true if the OS vendor supplied
a defaults.el or site-start.el file. Try doing these tests with
"xemacs -vanilla", which prevents loading of the user init file, the
site init file, and the site defaults file. Or you could try
installing the site files from 21.5.21 in 21.5.27. (Use M-x
locate-library RET defaults RET to find the defaults.el file.)
xemacs-21.5.21 data-utf8.txt status line: "UTF8"
content looks fine
xemacs-21.5.27 data-utf8.txt status line: "Binary" content incorrectly
displayed
This is wrong. But is it an installation problem on our side?
We haven't yet spent a lot of effort on the default configuration,
especially since the stable version, XEmacs 21.4, is very unreliable
in a Unicode environment, and the developers generally use 21.5 and
21.4 in the same environment. SuSE has long since moved to UTF-8 as
the default distribution-wide, and they almost surely distribute a
site-start file that configures XEmacs in that way.
So, I wouldn't call it "your installation problem", but I'm sure you
can change the default configuration to get better results.
If you can't find the site-start and defaults files from 21.5.21 or
they have bad side effects, try
M-x coding-priority-list RET
in *21.5.21* to get the detection priorities for 21.5.21. Then use
M-: (set-coding-priority-list <list>) RET to set *21.5.27* to match.
If that works, put (set-coding priority-list <list>) in the site-start
file. (We don't distribute one, you'll need to create it if you don't
copy from SuSE.)
HTH
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta