Michael makes two very important points in two separate posts on this
thread I want to say "Amen!" to and add stress.
Michael Sperber <sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes in
xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
>>>>> "Andy" == Andy Piper
<andyp(a)parallax.co.uk> writes:
...
Andy> Please reconsider. I personally think this should be on Ben's
Andy> showstopper list since we can fix it right now.
This has nothing to do with reconsideration. I simply don't have
the
time right now, and we can fix the problem independently of the
release. I'll get to it as soon as I possibly can.
The applicable phrase is "we can fix the problem independently of the
release". We're in a new generation of XEmacs. Non-dumped Lisp
packages can be fixed in an instant independently of whether a new
core is released.
If you don't understand this, please think about it for awhile. It's
true, and I've been practicing it with InfoDock since early July.
Michael Sperber <sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes in
xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
>>>>> "Andy" == Andy Piper
<andyp(a)parallax.co.uk> writes:
Andy> What about just applying jonathan's patch?
I really need to understand the issues properly first. I've had
no
end of trouble with applying patches to EFS I didn't fully comprehend.
Ditto regarding XEmacs patches I integrate.