>>> In message <by4ssokf56.fsf(a)bolzano.math.ethz.ch>
>>> On the subject of "Re: a new user"
>>> Sent on 28 Oct 1998 14:08:37 +0100
>>> Honorable Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes:
> Sam Steingold <sds(a)goems.com> writes:
>
> > >> that, but I was overruled. A sample setting for debug-ignored-errors
> >
> > what was the rationale?
>
> Running with debug-on-error set to t permanently is an expert thing.
> Experts can be expect to know how to set the variable themselves. For
> normal users you want to be able to tell them
>
> "If you get an error, set debug-on-error and mail me the backtrace".
>
> You don't want to have "Except when the error is in
> debug-ignored-errors then you'll have to set that for."
what's wrong with telling them to do:
(setq debug-on-error t debug-ignored-errors nil)
--
Sam Steingold (
http://www.goems.com/~sds) running RedHat5.1 GNU/Linux
Micros**t is not the answer. Micros**t is a question, and the answer is Linux,
(
http://www.linux.org) the choice of the GNU (
http://www.gnu.org) generation.
Only adults have difficulty with childproof caps.