Re: [COMMIT] Re: [Q] New "flush" face property
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Didier Verna <didier(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
Done, with a small difference. If we're to flush by default,
then it's
better to have a face property for /not/ flushing. I've called it
'shrink but other propositions are welcome.
'ragged ?
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Vin Shelton
Monday, 26 December
Mon, 26 Dec
8:21 p.m.
New subject: [COMMIT] Re: [Q] New "flush" face property
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Jerry James <james(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Didier Verna
<didier(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
> Done, with a small difference. If we're to flush by default, then it's
> better to have a face property for /not/ flushing. I've called it
> 'shrink but other propositions are welcome.
'ragged ?
+1 for 'ragged
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Tuesday, 27 December
Tue, 27 Dec
9:27 a.m.
New subject: [COMMIT] Re: [Q] New "flush" face property
Jerry James writes:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Didier Verna
<didier(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
> Done, with a small difference. If we're to flush by default, then it's
> better to have a face property for /not/ flushing. I've called it
> 'shrink but other propositions are welcome.
'ragged ?
The problem is that "ragged" normally applies to the text. If a face
has 'shrink true with (fill-paragraph 'justify) you will get a
"non-ragged" block of text in the current face with a right margin
(ie, past fill-column) in the default face.
To be technically accurate, we'd want to name it something like
do-not-spill-to-edge-of-window:-) but that's way too long.
How about "restricted" or "bounded" or "contained" (ie, by
the region
containing printing content) or something like that?
Or how about "shrinkwrap" (the buffer text)? "shrink-to-fit"? (Yes,
I'm getting silly, but even so those are probably better than anything
else I've suggested so far. :-/ And they're close to Didier's suggestion.)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Jerry James
Tuesday, 27 December
Tue, 27 Dec
5:58 p.m.
New subject: [COMMIT] Re: [Q] New "flush" face property
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
The problem is that "ragged" normally applies to the text.
If a face
has 'shrink true with (fill-paragraph 'justify) you will get a
"non-ragged" block of text in the current face with a right margin
(ie, past fill-column) in the default face.
To be technically accurate, we'd want to name it something like
do-not-spill-to-edge-of-window :-) but that's way too long.
How about "restricted" or "bounded" or "contained" (ie, by
the region
containing printing content) or something like that?
Or how about "shrinkwrap" (the buffer text)? "shrink-to-fit"?
(Yes,
I'm getting silly, but even so those are probably better than anything
else I've suggested so far. :-/ And they're close to Didier's suggestion.)
'minimal?
--
Jerry James, practicing minimalist replies
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Wednesday, 28 December
Wed, 28 Dec
4:57 a.m.
New subject: [COMMIT] Re: [Q] New "flush" face property
Jerry James writes:
Jerry James, practicing minimalist replies
I suggest you kiboze Andreas Schwab on emacs-devel for hints from a
master!
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
4713
days inactive
4715
days old
4 comments
3 participants
tags (0)
participants (3)
-
Jerry James -
Stephen J. Turnbull -
Vin Shelton