P E Jareth Hein <jareth(a)camelot.co.jp> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
>>>>> "sb" == SL Baur
<steve(a)xemacs.org> writes:
sb> I see there's a new stable CVS out. Any
success/horror stories,
sb> or is this pretty much the same as 1.9.28/1.9.29?
I just started playing with it yesterday. So far, so good.
So it built for you without regression errors?
I got:
$ make CFLAGS="-mpentium -march=pentium -O6 -fno-risc -fno-peep-spills" check
...
This test should produce no other output than this line, and a final "OK".
FAIL: devcom3-7
make[1]: *** [check] Error 1
...
Any clues about tracking this down?
After a couple of days more testing I'll upgrade
cvs.xemacs.org.
O.K. How are you doing local testing? I want to replace the 1.9
binaries I have, but not with any risk to XEmacs.