"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Michael Sperber writes:
> I suspect this statement arose from the fact that I wasn't responsive at
> the time this came around. (Or did anyone actively speak about against
> "unified filename syntax"?) For this, I apologize.
Something like that.... I don't recall anyone speaking against it.
+1 for unified syntax (even though rcp syntax sucks...).
I found a discussion about at
<
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta/16552/focus=14525>
Major concern was that EFS could be broken in package
management. There was also the suggestion that a unified syntax shall
be closed to URL syntax; this would need an agreement with the GNU
Emacs people.
But before we go into the discussion, the Tramp synchronization with
XEmacs shall be revitalised. Up to now it is stalled due to the GPLv3
issue - are there any news wrt this?
Best regards, Michael.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta