Charles> Adrian Aichner writes: Charles> Is it also fair to add to this, (since 21.1 and 21.2 Charles> share the same packages), that xemacs-beta is also OK for Charles> discussion of bugs, modifications, etc, to the packages Charles> (esp. versions of packages in CVS which have not been Of course! I forgot to mention that. What would XEmacs be without well-maintained (and tested) packages these day? Charles> officially released?). Or should this discussion also go Charles> to c.e.x ? -- Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org&gt;, http://www.xemacs.org