Kyle Jones <kyle_jones(a)wonderworks.com> writes:
> That is not an option. Many many many people care.
Absolutely agree. The FSF Emacs camp made many enemies by doing
this. At the same time, I'm sure they improved the quality of their
internationlization work by forcing themselves and every user to
constantly deal with it. But I don't know if that is an efficient
way to do business. The more I learn about internationalization the
more I think it is best handled by specialists, much the way
computer security work is handled today.
I'm not sure I understand the last sentence, just as I can't gather
what's being said on the sound clip, but I'm glad you agree with the
sentiment.
I have great fears regarding Mule development. Recent plans seem to
be taking Mule to the directions I don't like at all. One of these
days I'll once again relieve my heart of the Mule burden, and it will
be for good. <sniffle> <whimper>!
P.S.
Note that FSF also took the easy/ier way out by allowing a `--unibyte'
option and the corresponding EMACS_UNIBYTE environment variable.