Cliff Liu writes: What version of XEmacs? The backtrace is nearly useless, because it is related to a stripped binary. Even the function names are unreliable (they're usually OK, but sometimes a function gets optimized away completely or is declared static, and the name of a nearby function is substituted). I believe Red Hat supplies a debug package for XEmacs which provides the necessary symbols to give better localization and argument values. Please try to get that package and get a better backtrace. Without that, we can look, but it dramatically improves chances of finding something if we have the symbols and function arguments. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta