Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes:
> > We give the memory of destroyed buffers back don't we?
>
> Only in some cases, when compiling with relocating allocator.
But these some include 99% of the platforms our user run on, don't
they?
The fact is, I'm not convinced that Scheme works reliably. The
mmap-based relocating allocator is supposed to return memory to the
system, but even so... I still think opening (and unzipping) a bunch
of files is not to be dismissed lightly. I guess I'm in the minority.
[The devils advocate could argue at this point that you should
consider switching to a distro that has more frequent releases]
Like Solaris? :-) I'd use just about anything else, but everyone
around me uses Debian, so Debian it is. (And yes, they use potato
too.)
Ah, if only system administration were my favorite hobby.
> > > What's ~/.xemacs?
> >
> > A convenient directory for XEmacs to write stuff too, such as
> > precomputed help tables of contents.
>
> I thought the idea was that such a directory was strictly
> optional. I, for one, don't have one.
But if you need a feature that needs it, you'll need to.
In that case, XEmacs should create it for me. My turn to play the
devil's advocate, I guess.