[Ok, ignore all my previous ramblings....I checked FSF 20.3's source now.]
Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes:
Yes, and therefore XEmacs uses glibc 2.x's implementation of it
instead
of using its own. That is different in FSF Emacs isn't it?
So FSF does use the glibc allocator. However Steve forced XEmacs
minimal tag bit support to on when using the Doug lea allocator. I
cannot remember why. FSF Emacs doesn't have minimal tag bit support
doesn't it? That could be the difference but it seems to me now to be
more pure luck.
(XEmacs also doesn't free the malloc_state_ptr but surely that cannot
be it.
It isn't. It is just annoying because these fake implementation
make
XEmacs miscompile.
Just for the record: That is in an XEmacs bug.
Jan