I just tried the current CVS version again, and it seems as though the
problem of xemacs using a significant amount of ram is still
there. (i.e. xemacs -vanilla uses 50M RSS)
btw, there are a LOT of:
warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
which is pretty concerning. I'll see if I can take a look at this
tonight.
ttyl,
--
Josh Huber
Show replies by date