Simon Michael wrote:
Malcolm Box <malcolm-xemacs(a)brownale.demon.co.uk> writes:
> I suspect the minimum is xemacs, xemacs-base and efs but I'm guessing.
I've now verified that this is the case, and am now happily installing
packages.
On my last build (21.2b13) I downloaded the source, xemacs-base,
dired
and efs. That was sufficient for the package interface to work.
dired appears to be overkill for me.
The package interface is *wonderful*, by the way, but not yet
trouble-free for me. To get it working I had to make a change in
package-admin-default-install-function:
; (if (shell-command (concat "gunzip -c " filename " | tar xvf -")
buf)
(if (shell-command (concat "cd " default-directory "; gunzip -c "
filename " | tar xvf -") buf)
ie the default-directory var seems not to affect shell-command's
working directory.
For me, building and running on NT, I needed to go and build the minitar
program that is supplied in the nt directory but not built or installed
by default. The error "can't find program minitar" was a bit puzzling
to start with!
Would there be anything wrong with bundling the minimum package set
required for package installation, with the source ?
It would make things a lot simpler for first-time installers.
That seems very sensible to me. Call it xemacs-minimum or something.
Or are we assuming that most people won't be building from source, or
will just go get sumo?
Malcolm