Re: Ispell.el bug [was Re: Announcing Kspell version .10 alpha]
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
[Note xemacs-patches(a)xemacs.org is for patches only. Discussions
should only go to xemacs-beta. Unfortunately there exists no mail
equivalent of Follow-Up-To:]
Ken Stevens <kstevens(a)ichips.intel.com> writes:
This fix looks like the best solution to me, as calling append as
the
function is being built is a real dog. Thanks!
Would you mind sending any new version you release with this to
steve(a)xemacs.org (or xemacs-patches(a)xemacs.org to lighten the load on
steve). That would reduce any version skew between XEmacs and you.
Ideal would be of course if you become the maintainer of the ispell
XEmacs package. As a bonus you would get CVS for free :-) (contact
jens(a)mastaler.com for that)
> * ispell.el: changed *-latin-* symbols to *-8859-* so that
ispell
> can find the related coding systems.
Does this work right with emacsen other than XEmacs? If so I'll stick that
in as it is.
I am not a MULE expert (can one please comment) AFAIK the *-8859-*
names are preferred on FSF 20.3 too.
Thanks for the quick response.
Jan
Jason R Mastaler
Wednesday, 16 September
Wed, 16 Sep
4:57 a.m.
New subject: Ispell.el bug [was Re: Announcing Kspell version .10 alpha]
Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes:
[Note xemacs-patches(a)xemacs.org is for patches only. Discussions
should only go to xemacs-beta. Unfortunately there exists no mail
equivalent of Follow-Up-To:]
Actually there is `Mail-Followup-To', but not all MUAs support it.
See http://pobox.com/~djb/proto/replyto.html
Ideal would be of course if you become the maintainer of the ispell
XEmacs package. As a bonus you would get CVS for free :-) (contact
jens(a)mastaler.com for that)
I'm not sure who you are referring to, but I'll take a guess. In any
case, `jens(a)mastaler.com' is an invalid address.
Jason Mastaler == jason(a)xemacs.org
Jens Lautenbacher == jens(a)tellux.de
9565
days inactive
9566
days old
1 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
Jan Vroonhof -
Jason R Mastaler