>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
> 2. We move the stuff from term one level up and change
> `paths-load-path-depth' to 0.
sb> This is what I prefer as this ties in with a package installation
sb> option eschewing subdirectories and installing into one big
sb> package lisp/ directory.
Note this has nothing to do with packages. It's just core Lisp which
is causing the problem.
sb> #2 for the reason given above. We still have to handle subdirectories at
sb> least one level down from <package>/lisp/.
I don't think so. By far most of the stats don't happen there, they
happen for the core Lisp stuff. I think doing the above will make
people happy.
--
Cheers =8-} Chipsy
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla