Ville> Following Mats Lidell's suggestion, I wrote a crude shell script that Ville> smoketests XEmacs package builds, it's in CVS at Ville> xemacs-builds/scop/packages-smoketest.sh. cool sounds like a good plan i will have cable access soon so i will set up a cron job to run your script Ville> The first couple of runs have already shown that the bbdb, ess, Ville> pcomplete and tm may be suffering from the indirect/recursive REQUIRES Ville> problem, and that there are some entries missing from various Ville> .cvsignores. I'll get to these later. Ville> I haven't cron'd it, and it doesn't have any mail capabilities yet. Ville> Contributions welcome :) cool will have a look soon (interested in a perl version ??) Ville> I'm currently running it with XEmacs 21.1.14, 21.4.10 RC2 (RC3 soon), Ville> and 21.5.9, all Mule ones. It might be a good idea to run this on Ville> non-Mule XEmacsen too. yeah sounds like a plan -- XEmacs Advocate | Do not try the patience of Wizards, FreeBSD Devote | for they are subtle and quick to anger. Perl Hacker | - Elric (Technomage) , Babylon 5. Apache God | <mailto:rendhalver at xemacs.org> <GnuPG KeyID: AE51D190>

Ville> On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 10:29, Rendhalver [Peter Brown] wrote: Ville> I haven't cron'd it, and it doesn't have any mail capabilities yet. Ville> Contributions welcome :) Ville> If doing it adds some value, why not :) But I doubt that; the script Ville> could get even messier with Perl. maybe i will have a look soon and let you know Ville> I'm currently running it with XEmacs 21.1.14, 21.4.10 RC2 (RC3 soon), Ville> and 21.5.9, all Mule ones. It might be a good idea to run this on Ville> non-Mule XEmacsen too. Ville> Cool. Do you currently have non-Mule XEmacsen to test the script with? Ville> I don't (but will most likely build some soon), so it hasn't been tested Ville> at all with them, and it will blindly try to build mule-packages too... yep i have a non-mule 21.1 21.4 and 21.5 give me a couple of days to finish a contract im trying to do and i will give it a run and see what else we need to fix -- XEmacs Advocate | Do not try the patience of Wizards, FreeBSD Devote | for they are subtle and quick to anger. Perl Hacker | - Elric (Technomage) , Babylon 5. Apache God | <mailto:rendhalver at xemacs.org> <GnuPG KeyID: AE51D190>

On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 21:47, Vin Shelton wrote: Actually, I didn't run the tests when doing that change, and it was a plain simple braino by yours truly. Running the tests from a "make distclean"'ed tree would have caught that too. I'll make it optional. The packages tree is about 85M nowadays, which is pretty hefty, even with CVS compression on. Currently, the test script starts (by default) from a tree that has been told to "make distclean; cvs update -dAP", which should provide a clean start just as a fresh checkout would. Of course that depends on "make distclean" doing its job properly. Cheers, -- \/ille Skyttä ville.skytta at xemacs.org

~-0% cat ~/share/bin/cvsclean #!/usr/bin/perl sub cvsclean { my($path) = ＠_; my(%files) = (); my(＠subdirs); print STDOUT "Cleaning $path\n"; opendir (DIR, "$path/") || die "No directory $path"; open (ENTRIES, "$path/CVS/Entries") || die "No $path/CVS/Entries file"; while (<ENTRIES>) { if (m[^D/([^/]+)]) { push (＠subdirs, "$path/$1"); } elsif (m[^/([^/]+)/[^/-]]) { $files{$1} = "managed"; } } foreach $entry (readdir(DIR)) { if (!exists ($files{$entry})) { $entry = "$path/$entry"; if (-f $entry) { print STDOUT "unlink $entry\n"; unlink $entry; } } } foreach $subdir (＠subdirs) { &cvsclean ($subdir); } } &cvsclean ("."); ~-0%