Tom Browder writes: This may be next to impossible, because the code uses lexical scoping, a feature which XEmacs doesn't yet have. Perhaps it can be emulated with lexical-let from the cl.el package, but there are other contexts besides let-binding where this difference can matter. I don't know whether the font-lock features will work correctly, as font-locking in Emacs has diverged greatly from what we have. As far as packages go, it only seems to require Stefan Monnier's "smie", but I don't know how hard that will be to port. I personally can't help much with the lexical binding issue, as I've never worked with it. I agree that theoretically it's the Right Thing, but practically I've always been perfectly satisfied with the results of Emacs Lisp's traditional dynamic scope. If we can get over that hump, I'll be happy to consult on font-lock and other aspects of the port, but most of my hacking time for the next few months is going to be devoted to GSoC so I can't do a lot of the work myself. Steve _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta