>>>> "DO" == Darryl Okahata
<darrylo(a)sr.hp.com> writes:
DO> Mike Scheidler <c23mts(a)eng.delcoelect.com> wrote:
> You can't dispute raw numbers, but I don't think this is
an
> accurate usage indicator. I'd venture that most of the
> non-Linux binary kit downloads are used by more than one person
> (does an average of 10 sound reasonable?), while most Linux
> downloads are single-user.
This talk of only supporting linux disturbs me deeply. I cannot possibly
believe that anyone is seriously considering this?
I use linux on my laptop and I use solaris everywhere else. I like
linux, I like what it's done for the Unix community in general. What
I _don't_ like about linux is when I see all these pieces of software
come out that are written specifically for it without even a nod
towards portability. I get _really_ annoyed when I see that someone
has written a really nifty utility or tool or front-end or whatever
and it's riddled through with linux-isms which end up making it
difficult (if not downright impossible) to port to any other unix. A
perfect example for this is some of the graphical front-ends to cdrom
burning software. I end up using the command-line tools because the
GUI front-ends _to_ the command line tools were written in such a way
as to make it impossible to compile on any other platform without a
complete rewrite. It's ironic that the underlying tools that these
rely on are well-written cross-platform apps while the stupid FRONT
END tools which do nothing but feed the cross-platform CLI's are not.
Linux-centrism is JUST as bad as microsoft-centrism or
solaris-centrism or anything-else-centrism.
-- Gary F.
(who cannot even begin to communicate the frustration of trying to
compile the latest enlightenment snapshots on solaris, for example).
--
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority it is
time to pause and reflect." -- Mark Twain