Actually, what I found was that I had to run "autoconf" to re-generate
"configure".
-lipp
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: SL Baur [mailto:steveï¼ xemacs.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 1998 9:05 PM
>>> To: xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for possible `make install' bug
>>> in beta38-pre2
>>>
>>>
>>> Tetsuya HOYANO <hoyano(a)ari.bekkoame.ne.jp> writes:
>>>
>>> > ----Next_Part(Thu_Apr_30_13:00:42_1998_349)--
>>> > Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
>>> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>>
>>> >>>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
>>>
>>> sb> There's confusion between configure's `progname' and
>>> the `progname'
>>> sb> used by the Makefiles. This patch makes everything
>>> consistent. After
>>> sb> applying this patch, the generated src/paths.h looks
>>> cleaner anyway.
>>>
>>> > beta38-pre2 built fine, then `./config.status --recheck',
>>>
>>> I'm sorry. You must rerun configure from scratch.
>>>
>>> > `make beta' and `make install' install them into
>>> > /usr/local/lib/-21.0-b38/ not into
>>> /usr/local/lib/xemacs-21.0-b38/
>>> > after applied this patch.
>>>
>>> > I am confusing...
>>>
>>> That sounds about right, unfortunately. Rerun configure
>>> from scratch
>>> and things should be O.K.
>>>