Re: XEmacs source code + packages have moved to bitbucket
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
Raymond Toy <toy.raymond(a)gmail.com> writes:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Michael Sperber
<sperber(a)deinprogramm.de>wrote:
>
>
> What's your version of Mercurial? Can you send the output of
>
hg --version says 1.4.3. FWIW, I was able to check the packages on a couple
of other machines which were using newer versions of hg (> 1.6, I think).
Then I think we can safely blame 1.4 as a too-old version, right?
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Wednesday, 12 October
Wed, 12 Oct
9:11 p.m.
New subject: XEmacs source code + packages have moved to bitbucket
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Michael Sperber
<sperber(a)deinprogramm.de>wrote:
Raymond Toy <toy.raymond(a)gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Michael Sperber <sperber(a)deinprogramm.de
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> What's your version of Mercurial? Can you send the output of
>>
>
> hg --version says 1.4.3. FWIW, I was able to check the packages on a
couple
> of other machines which were using newer versions of hg (> 1.6, I think).
Then I think we can safely blame 1.4 as a too-old version, right?
Works for me. Sort of. This is the default version with Ubuntu 10.04.
Not a problem for me to build my own version of hg.
Ray
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
Sunday, 16 October
Sun, 16 Oct
2:17 a.m.
New subject: XEmacs source code + packages have moved to bitbucket
On 10/12/11 11:10 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:
Raymond Toy <toy.raymond(a)gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Michael Sperber
<sperber(a)deinprogramm.de>wrote:
>
>>
>> What's your version of Mercurial? Can you send the output of
>>
> hg --version says 1.4.3. FWIW, I was able to check the packages on a couple
> of other machines which were using newer versions of hg (> 1.6, I think).
Then I think we can safely blame 1.4 as a too-old version, right?
Yes, I guess that's the conclusion. Or at least that's good enough for
me.
Ray
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
4786
days inactive
4790
days old
2 comments
2 participants
tags (0)
participants (2)
-
Michael Sperber -
Raymond Toy