Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes:
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
> Finally, I do need integers as large as I can get, even when it's not
> the full 32 bits. We'll have to find another way for dealing with
> UCS-4.
Do the swap only on Mule?
That would be the worst possible option. Mule should bring new
functionality, not cripple XEmacs. I can already hear people saying,
"Oh, you need larger buffers? Why, compile without Mule -- everyone
sensible does that."
You do not really want to do O(n^2) operations on 1 Gbyte buffers
anyway.
You don't. Why do you ask?