Andy,
You're absolutely right. I was wondering why my NT efs didn't work out of
the box. This was particularly vexing because, as you said, efs is
nearly essential for getting package updates. Ben, can you add "working
efs on NT" as an item to your showstopper list? Michael, what's the
problem with adding Jonathan's patch? IIRC, you don't have access to NT,
but you want to understand the patch; how are you going to be able to move
forward on this issue?
vin
Andy Piper wrote:
I don't know what anyone else thinks but I am of the opinion that
the
version of efs that gets distributed with the binary installer of xemacs on
nt *must* have Jonathan's efs patch in it. Its completely crazy
distributing something that is just broken, and we will get endless faq's
about it. I think it must be patched in the installer also because efs is
critical to being able to get hold of other packages in an easy way. People
should be able to install the binary dist configure efs and get hold of
other packages that they don't have installed. efs must work out of the box.
Thoughts?