Hallo,
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 12:27:29PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
By this argument Debian should not distribute the ASN1 mode as a
Debian
package either? They currently do. It is even distributed in the "free"
category.
It's called "main", the other sections are "non-free" and
"contrib".
I have CCed the debian maintainer of the asn1-mode package. Do you
remember if the license was discussed?
There was a short discussion about the license, but not
about the issue, whether GNU Emacs modes have to be GPL or
not.
Richard, if you can provide some guidance on how to resolve this, it
would
be very useful. The core of the problem seem to be if it should be
possible to write non-GPL Emacs Lisp code at all. Much like it is
possible to write non-GPL code using Bash, GCC-specific C, Guile, Python
and other GPLd programming languages, I think it should be possible to
write non-GPL Emacs Lisp, but that's just my opinion.
As for the ASN.1 mode, I will kindly ask the authors
(Olivier Dubuisson, Guillaume Latu, and Stephane Levant, see
http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/en/tools/emacs/unix/ for details)
to change the license to GPL, if necessary. If they don't
want to or can't do this, and the FSF insist on GPLed modes,
Debian cannot distribute the mode at all, not even in
"non-free".
Cheers,
--
W. Borgert <debacle(a)debian.org>